The Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Technology (JNAMT) recognizes the importance of ongoing scholarly dialogue and actively encourages constructive post-publication discussions. Such interactions are essential for maintaining the integrity, accuracy, and continued relevance of engineering and maritime research literature.
Guidelines for Submitting Letters and Comments
Letters or comments must be concise, respectful, and based on credible technical or scientific evidence, addressing significant issues related to published articles.
Submissions must clearly reference the original article, including its title, author(s), publication date, and DOI.
Personal accusations, unsubstantiated claims, or inflammatory statements are strictly prohibited.
Review and Editorial Response Procedure
1. The editorial office receives and acknowledges submitted letters or comments.
2. Submissions are evaluated for appropriateness, technical relevance, and clarity.
3. If appropriate, the authors of the original article are invited to respond.
4. Both the letter and the authors’ response undergo final editorial assessment.
5. The Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with the Editorial Board, makes the final decision regarding publication.
Corrections and Clarifications
1. Errors or ambiguities identified after publication must be reported promptly to the editorial office.
2. The editorial team evaluates the claim and contacts the authors for clarification.
3. Confirmed minor errors are corrected promptly, with a correction notice linked to the original article.
4. Ambiguities or misunderstandings are addressed through editorial clarifications for reader guidance.
Expressions of Concern
1. When credible concerns regarding research integrity, technical accuracy, or data validity arise, an investigation is initiated.
2. An “Expression of Concern” notice is published to inform readers while the investigation is ongoing.
3.Authors are contacted to provide explanations and supporting evidence.
4. Where necessary, the journal works with relevant institutional authorities, following COPE guidelines.
Retractions
1. Reports of serious errors, ethical breaches, or research misconduct trigger an immediate editorial investigation.
2. Authors are informed and given the opportunity to respond.
3. The Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board evaluate all evidence and responses.
4. Confirmed cases lead to article retraction, with a detailed notice explaining the reasons.
Ethical and Responsible Communication
Post-publication discussions must uphold the highest standards of ethical communication.
Confidentiality, fairness, and the protection of all parties’ rights are essential.
All communications must remain professional and respectful.
Editorial Transparency
JNAMT is committed to transparency in managing post-publication discussions.
All editorial actions—including corrections, clarifications, expressions of concern, or retractions—are thoroughly documented and communicated promptly to the engineering and maritime research community.
