Microplastic Pollution in Ship-Sourced Wastewater: Assessment of Pollution Load Risk for Ballast and Bilge Water
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
VOLUME: 228 ISSUE: 1
P: 1 - 10
January 2026

Microplastic Pollution in Ship-Sourced Wastewater: Assessment of Pollution Load Risk for Ballast and Bilge Water

J Nav Archit Mar Technol 2026;228(1):1-10
1. İstanbul Technical University Faculty of Maritime Department of Basic Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 08.09.2025
Accepted Date: 01.12.2025
Online Date: 07.01.2026
Publish Date: 07.01.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

The rapid development of maritime transport also causes a number of negative environmental impacts. One of these problems is marine pollution caused by the operation of ships. Pollution from ship sewage includes ballast water (BAL-W) and bilge water (BIL-W), which are regulated under International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships Annex IV. Both BAL-W and BIL-W samples were analysed in the study. Many of the microplastic (MP) particles detected in the BAL-W samples were micro sized, while the majority of MPs found in the BIL-W samples were macro (>0.5 mm) and micro (1 µm-<5 mm) in size. The findings show that MPs constitute the majority (53%) of the plastics analysed, followed by 25% mesoplastics and 11% nanoplastics (NPs). Plastics with a size class of 50-300 µm were most abundant in both BAL-W and BIL-W. For BAL-W and BIL-W sources, the average MP sizes were calculated to be 0.025-4.99±0.050 mm and 0.05-0.1±0.050 mm, respectively. Rubber/commercial (PNEU), polyethylene (PET) terephthalate, polystyrene (PS), and polyoxymethylene (POM) were the most abundant polymer types found in the BIL-W samples, accounting for 47.82%, 10.86%, 9.78%, and 6.55%, respectively, while PNEU and PE were the most abundant polymer types found in the BAL-W samples, accounting for 22.91% and 7.98%, respectively. The pollution load index was calculated 7.75 (Hazard Category IV) and 12.17 (Hazard Category V) for BAL-W and BIL-W waters. It is now clear that the BAL-W management system needs to be evaluated to eliminate MP pollution due to the presence of polymers in BIL-W and BAL-W.

Keywords:
Marine environmental protection, MARPOL 73/78 Annex IV, sewage from ships, microplastic pollution, pollution load index (PLI)

1. Introduction

The massive amounts of plastic in the world’s seas and oceans create a serious hazards to their natural ecological live. It is anticipated that 0.8 to 23.0 million tons of plastic wastes are floating in the seas and oceans [1]. Micro and macroplastics (MPs) contribute significantly to marine plastic pollution. With the increase in global maritime trade, the number of merchant ships is growing every year. As more ships transport, in addition to environmental degradation on land, pollution from ships is growing. The pieces of plastic are categorized based on their size: mesoplastics (5-25 mm), MPs (1-5 mm; MPs), and nanoplastics (<1 µm; NPs) [2-4]. MPs, particularly NPs, are tiny particles that may cause a variety of impacts on marine and coastal organisms. Ingestion of these plastics may threaten marine organisms’ growth, survival, and reproduction [5]. They may also be hazardous to human health since they accumulate in seafood [6].

Sources of pollution reaching the seas and oceans include terrestrial origin (44%), atmospheric pollution (33%), pollution from maritime activities (12%), waste and sewage dumping (10%), and offshore drilling and mining (1%) [7, 8]. While terrestrial or anthropogenic pollutants are the main sources, pollutants from ships also contribute signific antly to marine pollution. The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL 1973/78) is the core international maritime convention adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to prevent both operational and accidental pollution [9]. The Convention consists of six technical Annexes covering various aspects of marine pollution prevention, e.g., oil, toxic liquids, garbage, and emissions. Two of these annexes are “Annex I. Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Oil” and “Annex IV: Prevention of Pollution from Ship Sewage.” In addition, The ballast water (BAL-W) Management Convention or BWM Convention (2004) is a treaty adopted by the IMO in order to help prevent the spread of potentially harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens in ships’ BAL-W.  According to all, the discharge of ship sewage also contributes to marine pollution. Sewage, greywater, debris, oil/water separator effluent, cooling water, boiler and steam generator blow-down, and bilge water (BIL-W) are examples of waste streams on ships [10]. Among these, BAL-W is important for its water-capacity, BIL-W is another waste source with high pollutant potential due to ship operational processes (the engine room and leaks or maintenance operations etc.). Therefore, these two wastewater types were chosen for this study.

Marine pollution is widely described as the hazardous migration of substances or energy that alters physical, chemical, or biological characteristics due to human activity (MARPOL Convention, 1973/78) [11]. However, in this context, organisms carried in BAL-W are regarded as biological agents rather than “substances”. BAL-W and BIL-W are regarded as critical vectors for the spread of various pollutants, including MPs, across the world’s seas [12, 13]. MPs are synthetic plastic particles less than 5 mm in diameter that are persistent and non-biodegradable in the environment [14, 15]. These particles not only represent physical pollution, but also threaten the health of ecosystems as they act as carriers for toxic chemicals, heavy metals, and pathogenic microorganisms. BAL-W and BIL-W, in particular, are thought to be key sources of conveyance for the spread of biological pollution and pollutants in the marine environment. However, barely anything has been revealed about the plastics included in BAL-W and BIL-W.

BAL-W: Maritime traffic continues to increase, with around 51,400 merchant ships in operation worldwide and around 3 to 5 billion tons of BAL-W carried by ships every year [7]. Today, BAL-W is one of the most important maritime pollutants and is associated with about one third of documented infestations worldwide. One of the biggest challenges for maritime transport is to find safe solutions for BAL-W management that minimize the environmental impact. To address this issue, following its regular meetings, the IMO has revised Annex IV of MARPOL 73/78 and made it mandatory for large ships to be equipped with a BAL-W management system (BWMS) from September 2025 [11]. This reduces the potential of invasive species spreading as a result of ships discharging untreated BAL-W. However, these waste waters, which are discharged and distributed in vast amounts across the world, are only disinfected for microbiological causes (Table 1) [16, 17]. It still allows for the transfer of other pollutant factors, such as MPs. During ballasting, large amounts of seawater are pumped into the ballast tanks of ships. As a result, various creatures and particles prevalent in the maritime environment, including plastics, enter the ballast tanks with the brine and accumulate. Consequently, the collection of BAL-W from polluted territories could lead in MPs entering the port of destination when water treatment does not occur out [18]. In this way, MPs might contribute to marine pollution by BAL-W or BIL-W during marine transportation and act as a reservoir of pollutants.

To meet discharge standards, almost all ships are expected to be equipped with BWMS. Although various technologies such as filtration, chlorination, ozonation, pasteurization, and ultraviolet radiation (alone or in combination) are used for water purification [19, 20], these are not effective methods for combating MP pollution. Studies have found that the average content of MPs in ship BAL-W and seawater samples were 12.53 and 11.80 units/L, respectively, with a high concentration of MPs in the 50-300 µm size class. The findings identified the main sources of MPs (such as BAL-W), their transport pathways and the associated ecological risks to marine ecosystems [12].

BIL-W: Various harmful substances, consisting of MPs and heavy metals, might enter the sea from ships through a variety of sources, including grey water, wastewater, ship cooling water, and treated sewage. Wastewater from regular ship operations persists and poses a significant risk to coastal aquatic ecosystems [21, 22]. The wastewater has a pH range of 6.8 to 9.0, a salinity of 25 to 35 g/L, an oil concentration of 36 to 2953 mg/L, and a high chemical oxygen demand> 3-15 g/L [23]. In addition, studies have found MPs in wastewater [12]. For these reasons, strict environmental regulations on wastewater discharges and the tendency to reuse treated water make wastewater treatment a critical factor. MARPOL 73/78 regulates BIL-W management, limiting oil content to ≤15 mg/L when discharged into the sea. The literature reports on various types of BIL-W treatment methods, including coagulation, flocculation, membrane filtration, electrocoagulation, flotation, and combinations of these processes [24, 25].

In addition, investigations have demonstrated that MPs accumulate in a variety of marine animals [26-28], and because of their small size, these particles can be ingested by a wide range of marine organisms [12]. Also, MPs have the ability to adhere to a variety of marine contaminants, including heavy metals, and accelerate their build up in the marine environment [29, 30]. Human exposure to MPs and other contaminants that build up in marine food webs may have negative consequences [14]. All of this emphasizes how our seas are affected by MP contamination. Although there is few research on the migration of MPs through BAL-W, there aren’t many on the migration of MPs through BIL-W. BAL-W and BIL-W pollutants, which have been studied in small quantities for MPs [12].

The aims of this study were to investigate MPs abundance and their characteristics, including size, polymer type, and chemical composition, in the BAL-W and BIL-W of ships, and to determine the pollution load index (PLI) of MPs in the BAL-W and BIL-W.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Sampling Stations

The sampling work was conducted from April to September, 2024. There were seven sampling stations (Table 1) set up, 4 BAL-W and 3 BIL-W in the different type of ships, and seven waste water samples from ship-originated were obtained by collecting sample at each station. The vessels from which water samples were selected at random from three seas: the Black Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, and the Marmara Sea, regardless of type or tonnage. Table 2 shows information about each of the ships that were sampled for ship sewage, and Table 3 shows the physical and chemical measurement results of the samples. The BAL-W volume of the ships ranged from 500 m3 to 10,000 m3.

2.2. Sample Collection

Samples were collected from 7 sampling station (Table 3) as vertically water column. BAL-W sampling depth varied from 2 m to 6 m, while the BIL-W samples were taken from a depth of around 1 m below the surface. For this purpuse, 7 samples the volumes are given in Table 2, were collected with containers to include MPs. Then all the samples were transferred into the glass bottle and treated with hydrogen peroxide (30% v/v, Merck, Germany) to in order to remove organic material [31-33]. The bottles were rinsed several times with ethanol before use. Checked for any potential contamination occurring in the sample in the field and laboratory. Water samples were stored in dark and cold conditions until MP analysis.

2.3. Analysis

The polymer type of each presumed MP particle was determined by attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (micro-ATR-FTIR) at the laboratory. The samples were passed through a cellulose pre-filter and then filtered through 13 mm diameter aluminium oxide membrane filters with a 0.1 µm pore size (Whatman Cytiva Anodisc, Germany) into glass petri dishes. The collected samples were left under a fume hood for 2 hours and prepared for measurement with the micro-FTIR device. This technique produces high-quality spectral images of sample areas, with a pixel resolution of 6, 25, 25, or 50 micro meters. The dried filters were stored in a dust-free environment until the time of analysis. The filters were scanned in the imaging mode of the Perkin Elmer FTIR Spotlight 400 device using the Spectrum Image application (optical imaging), and transmittance measurements (chemical imaging) were taken across the entire filter surface. The chemical imaging was performed within a 10 mm x 10 mm area, scanning a 200 µm x 200 µm surface in the IR spectrum range of 690-4000 cm-¹ using the Spectrum 3 application. Spectra were compiled after applying atmospheric correction, and data processing (MP mapping) was carried out using the siMPle application (Aalborg University-Denmark, Alfred-Wegener Institute-Germany). The results compiled from the siMPle application were used to create a MP distribution table.

2.4. PLI

This method has been commonly employed in earlier investigations of heavy metal pollution in sediment [34, 35], and researchers are currently applying it for assessing the risk of MPs [36-38]. The PLI is a standard method for observing and evaluating pollution levels at various locations.

Tomlinson et al. [39] (1980) developed the pollutant load index. The PLI calculates pollution load by taking into account various contaminants (e.g., all metals) at various location. It is a basic geometric mean for the pollution factor (CF). The CF is calculated according to Equation 1 [40].

In Equation 1, CF; CFi and Co are the observed concentration of MPs at sampling location and the lowest concentration/background value of MP detected in the sample, respectively.

The PLI was derived with Equation (2):

Where i represents a sample, n represents the number of samples, Ci represents the abundance of plastic in sample i, and Co represents the lowest element concentration found in the accessible literature [41]. However, in the lack of background data from similar environments, the lowest baseline limit for MP abundance identified in this study was set at 0.05 units/m3 based on data from the study conducted by Mutuku et al. [42] (2024) in five major oceans.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. MPs Size Distribution from Ship-Sewage

MPs were detected in all BAL-W and BIL-W samples. The BAL-W and BIL-W samples presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2 included 96 and 92 plastic particles, respectively. Figure 2 shows the mean number of MPs in BAL-W and seawater. MPs amounts in the BAL-W and BIL-W samples were 5.28 (±3.57) and 6.20 (±3.20) items/L, respectively. There was no significant difference (p-value> 0.05) in the number of MPs between BAL-W and BIL-W. The abundance of MPs in the bilge tanks of the ships was moderately higher (36±4.99 items/L) than in the ballast tanks (5.0±1.39 items/L) (Figures 1 and 2).

The Persian Gulf (Bushehr port and Assaluyeh port) found concentrations ranging from 5.53 to 21.6 items/m3 [12], whereas our concentrations in the BAL-W samples were similarly level with a range between 4.8 to 27 items/m3. Furthermore, research by Matiddi et al. [43] investigated levels of MP in the BAL-W of nine commercial ships and found values ranging from 100 to 1410 items/m3, with a mean of 651 items/m3.

The BAL-W samples contained 55.6.0% particles between 25 and 50 µm, 38.8% with particles larger than 50 µm, and 5.6% with particles smaller than 25 µm. But, 48.0% of the plastics in the SS samples were 0.05-0.1 mm particles, 24.0% were 0.1-0.25 mm particles, and the remaining 28% were plastics larger than 0.25 mm. Previous research found that MPs were most prevalent in seawater in the Persian Gulf, Iran [44], Caspian Sea, Iran [45], and Marmara Sea, Türkiye [46] with sizes of 1000-3000, 1000-5000, and 1-100 µm, respectively.

In BAL-W operations, the point of intake is critical. The plastic particle count per unit volume in the ballast sample is predicted to be high when the ballast intake occurs in a hub or busier port. Conversely, the plastic count density will be low in port locations with limited capacity. Terrestrial pollution is also influenced by the port area’s population density and residential layout.

Remarkably high abundances of mezo and macro particles were found in two bilge samples (5 and 6), up to 4.69 and 15.33 items/L. However, 1.55 to 4.8 µm/L particles were quantified in the ballast tank, which is also located in the 7th sample. In samples 5 and 7, which show the highest plastic abundance, it is noticeable that these two sampling sites are commercial port areas with heavy shipping traffic. It is assumed that the intensive commercial activities, population density, and terrestrial contaminants in these areas have contributed to the increase in plastic density.

Particularly in aquatic bodies, MPs gradually degrade into smaller MP and even NP fragments due to regular abrasion [47]. An enormous major threat in the proliferation of these small plastic particles is their potential hazard to organisms that continuously ingest them and their bioaccumulation in living organisms [48, 49]. Based on this objective, it is anticipated that the elements of ship sewage tanks might add to the MP pollution that is already there and spread the related chemical and biological pollutants.  It is crucial to note that MPs are effective vectors for the transport of heavy metals and chemical pollutants across many miles. The presence of MPs in the marine environment, may migrate to enter of MPs and connected contaminants into food chains and eventually ingested by human [50]. Therefore, it is stressed to adopt strict regulations to minimize MP levels in ship sewage tanks before discharge through effective treatment systems [51].

3.2. Chemical Characterization of Microplastics

This study investigated the presence of MPs in the BAL-W and BIL-W of ships sailing in various seas and ports. The 188 plastic particles in the BS and SS samples belong to six polymer types: polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyoxymethylene (POM), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), and Rubber/commercial (PNEU). The chemical composition of the plastics has been confirmed using micro-FTIR spectroscopy. Figure 3 displays the color codes for the different polymer types observed in the BAL-W and BIL-W samples. However, particles containing protein, cellulose, crustaceans and etc. have been excluded from the particle count. Our study of the MP samples from the ship sewage indicates that the main constituent is PNEU (rubber/commercial), with POM and PET being the other two typically identified polymers. PNEU and POM are engineering thermoplastics used for manufacturing specific components with high stiffness, low friction, and superior dimensional stability. Seals and rubbers are commonly utilized in marine machinery and auxiliary operations for both static and dynamic applications. PNEU pneumatic systems provide several advantages. Furthermore, POM polymer is employed in high-performance technical components such as tiny gears, ball bearings, skid plates, fasteners, clamps, and locking mechanisms. As therefore, long-lasting polymers like POM and PNEU are chosen in corrosive and abrasive conditions like seawater. In contrast, PET is generally used in areas such as the food industry, beverage packaging, packaging film, plastic boxes, kitchenware, mechanical engineering and packaging. It is also a preferred material in the manufacture of moving parts that operate under high pressure. Unlike PNEU and POM, emissions in ship-sourced wastewater are assumed to be caused by human or essential activity. Although the maritime environment contains a wide range of plastics, MPs such as polyvinyl chloride, PP, PE, PS, PET, and polyamide are prevalent [32, 54]. According to published studies, the most popular polymer types in the Persian Gulf of Iran are PE, PET, and nylon [53], PP and PE are the most prevalent polymer types in the surface waters of China’s Yellow Sea region [53], and nylon is the most prevalent polymer type in Antarctica’s Ross Sea [46]. For example, pneumatic rubber fenders are used in ports and on ships to minimize structural damage in the event of collisions [54]. However, the rubber broken from these collisions can enter the marine ecosystem and be carried into the tanks during ballast transportation. The findings of this study are coherent with previous studies, but also provide new details about BIL-W that have been little discussion thus far. The differences in the abundance of MPs and the types of polymers may be due to various factors such as traffic, fishing and marine tourism on various coasts of the world.

While most MP particles were observed in BAL-W samples 7 and 1 in Figure 4a, the particles in BIL-W samples 1 and 4 were mostly micro- and mesoplastic (Figure 4b). While sample 2 contained more plastic fragments (Figure 5b), sample 5 contained predominantly mesoplastic particles (Figure 5a). The BIL-W samples contained fewer particles in the 1-5 mm size range, while the BAL-W samples had the most particles in the <50 mm range.

The findings of this investigation indicated that MPs were not eliminated by the BAL-W disinfection system, and that both wastewaters included polymers of various types and sizes.

3.3. Risk Assessment of MP PLI

Pollution indexes are widely used to assess plastic pollution in aquatic and terrestrial environments [38, 55]. These indexes provide a quantitative framework for assessing pollution levels and potential ecological risks [37]. As macro-, micro- and NPs mostly originate from anthropogenic sources, the determination of a reference background level (Co) for the assessment of plastic pollution remains a crucial challenge [56]. As there are no defined standards for assessing for the risk assessment of plastics, the results of the PLI largely depend on the chosen reference background value of plastic abundance [57]. However, these reference values may vary considerably from study to study. Some research employs probabilistic analytical values based on species sensitivity distributions [58], whereas others utilize the minimal abundance values at the sampling site as baseline concentrations [59]. These methodological inadequacies contribute to large variations in PLI-based risk evaluations for MPs [55]. The concentration of MPs in the seas varies from 0.002 to 22 pc/m3, revealing a skewed distribution. The average concentration was highest in the Atlantic Ocean (2.58 pc/m3) and lowest in the Southern Ocean (0.04 pc/m3) [42].

Table 4 represents the PLI calculated for the BAL-W and BIL-W samples. The estimated pollutant load index indicated significant pollution risks in two BAL-W samples and a very high pollution risk in five samples. A high PLI score indicate the region is contaminated with MPs.

The calculated PLI values for all BIL-W samples were 10.2≤ PLI <12.17,  indicating a very high level of very high pollution (Hazard Category V). The calculated PLI values for BAL-W ranged from Hazard Category IV to Hazard Category V. This type of risk assessment for ship sewage is unique to this study; similar results have been reported for Categories IV and V in urban sewage [60] and seawater [61, 62]. Previous research by Dar and Gani [55] (2025) has found that the PLI ranged from 3.9 (Hazard Category I) to 40 (Hazard Category IV), indicating that glaciers are moderately to severely polluted. The findings of the PLI of MPs reveal that the environmental impact of MP pollution in the oceans, as well as the contribution of ship sewage (BAL-W and BIL-W), represent a significant risk to marine ecosystems. BAL-W and BIL-W wastewater may transport MP particles and pollutants in these plastics between ports.

In addition, MP fragments have the potential to be significant carriers of pollutants [63, 64]. These transports can retain pollutants on their surfaces through physical adsorption, depending on potential pollutants such as heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, etc., in the regional marine and ocean ecosystem, and even transfer them to marine organisms or humans that feed on them.

Based on the findings of this study, BIL is an important source of MPs, as it is exposed to intense pollution from ship auxiliary operational processes. BAL is also a potential source of MPs, which can act as a carrier of these particles and related pollutants between different ports and could potentially have harmful effects on the marine environment, aquatic organisms, and, consequently, human health. As a result, macro-, micro-, and NPs are capable of acting as vectors for pollutant transmission, hence their inclusion as an environmental impact element in ship sewage regulations (e.g., MARPOL Annex I or Annex IV) is beneficial and raising awareness is necessary in the maritime sector.

4. Conclusion

The micro-FTIR analysis of BAL-W and BIL-W samples conducted in this work revealed that ship sewage poses a serious environmental risk in terms of MP pollutants. The most prevalent polymers identified in BAL-Ws were POM, PNEU, and PET, whereas POM, PET, PS, and PNEU were found in BIL-Ws. The abundance of MPs in the bilge tanks of the ships was moderately higher (37±0.7 particles/L) than in the ballast tanks (24.0±1.0 particles/L). We concluded that the MP content in BIL-W is often higher than in BAL-W, making BIL-Ws popular places to find MP pollution due to the impacts of various operational and natural factors, such as tank position, personnel activities, environmental conditions, waves, and wind, causing bilge tanks more prone to the accumulation of large amounts of MP. The findings reveal that the BWMS implemented by the IMO as part of the MARPOL Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment are insufficient for eliminating MPs contamination.

According to the pollutant load index, ship-sewage from BAL-W and BIL-W is rated as Hazard Category IV (significant pollution) and Hazard Category V (extreme pollution), causing serious environmental risk. All of the study’s findings highlight the importance of ships in sea ecosystem, as well as their far-reaching influence as a result of their many interactions with the environment. The findings of this study, which focus on the kind and concentration of MPs that collect in ship sewage, can be utilized as primary data to inform future research on the impact of MPs on ships. Based on the findings of the study, it is recommended to implement effective waste management systems, introduce stricter regulations, and raise marine sector awareness.

Financial Disclosure: The author declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
M. Strokal, P. Vriend, M. P. P. Bak, C. Kroeze, J. van Wijnen, and T. van Emmerik, “River export of macro- and microplastics to seas by sources worldwide”, Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 4842, Aug 2023.
2
P. Madala, A. Waikar, and H. Parate, “Detection to remediation: strategies for managing microplastic pollution in freshwater systems”, International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering , vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 5301-5316, 2025.
3
GESAMP, “Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: a global assessment”, (Kershaw, P.J., ed.). Rep. Stud. GESAMP, 90-96, 2015.
4
A.L. Andrady “The plastic in microplastics: a review”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 12-22, Jun 2017.
5
M. Cole, C. Lindeque Halsband, and T. S. Galloway, “Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review”, Marine Pollution Bulletin , vol. 62, no. 12, 2588-2597, Dec 2011.
6
M. R. M. Zaki, and A. Z. Aris, “An overview of the effects of nanoplastics on marine organisms”, Science Total Environmental , vol. 20, no. 831, pp. 154757, 2022.
7
M. Čović, B. Bacalja, M. Krčum, and G. J. Mrčelić, “From ballast water to harmful air emissions: how to reduce the impact of shipping on the pollution of the marine environment -a review”, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, vol. 204, pp. 105-116, Sep 2021.
8
G. Potters, Marine Pollution. Bookboon, 1st edition. ISBN 978-87-403-0540-1, 2013.
9
IMO (International Maritime Organization), “International convention for the control and management of ships’ ballast water and sediments”, London, BWM/CONF/36, London, U.K. 2004.
10
WHO, Guide to ship sanitation. 3rd edition. World Health Organization; 2011.
11
M. Convention, “International convention for the prevention of pollution from ships”, MARPOL Conventional Outlet. 1973. http://www.imo.org
12
A. Zendehboudi, et al. “Analysis of microplastics in ships ballast water and its ecological risk assessment studies from the Persian Gulf”, Marine Pollution Bulletin , vol. 198, pp. 115825, Jan 2024.
13
M. Arienzo, L. Ferrara and Marco Trifuoggi, “The dual role of microplastics in marine environment: sink and vectors of pollutants”, Journal of Marine Science Engineering , vol 9, pp. 642, Jun 2021.
14
A. Anthony, “Microplastics in the marine environment”, Marine Pollution Bulletin , vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1596-1605, Aug 2011.
15
L. Peng, D. Fu, H. Qi, C.Q. Lan, H. Yu, & C.bGe, “Micro-and nano-plastics in marine environment: source, distribution and threats — a review”, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 698, 134254, Jan 2020.
16
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), “ Generic protocol for the verification of ballast water treatment technology ”, version 5.1. In: Report Number EPA/600/R-10/146. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 2010.
17
Global TestNet, “Ballast Water Management system”, 2021. https://globaltestnet.org/our-work.html
18
U.S. Coast Guard, “In: standards for living organisms in ships’ ballast water discharged in U.S. waters”, Final Rule. FR, 77, 17254-17304, 2012.
19
E. Tsolaki, and E. Diamadopoulos, “Technologies for ballast water treatment: a review”, Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 19-32, Jan 2010.
20
W. A. Gerhard, K. Lundgreen, G. Drillet, R. Baumler, H. Holbech, and C.K. Gunsch, “Installation and use of ballast water treatment systems – implications for compliance and enforcement”, Ocean & Coastal Management , vol. 181, no. 1, 104907, Nov 2019.
21
J. Lloret, N. Zaragoza, D. Caballero, and V. Riera, “Impacts of recreational boating on the marine environment of Cap de Creus (Mediterranean Sea)”, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 749-754, 2008.
22
O. V. Malakhov, O. M. Palagin, A. I. Naydyonov, K. A. Lytkhoglyad, and A. V. Bondarenko, “Bilge and oily water treatment during operation of vessel”, TransNav, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 433-445, 2024.
23
J. Church, et al. “Identification and characterization of bilgewater emulsions”, Science of the Total Environment , vol. 691, pp. 981-995, Nov 2019.
24
M. Han, J. Zhang, W. Chu, J. Chen, and G. Zhou, “Research progress and prospects of marine oily wastewater treatment: a review”, Water, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2517, Nov 2019.
25
S. Soeprijanto, D. F. Nury, and L. Pudjiastuti, “Treatment of oily wastewaters from Tanjung Perak Port by electrocoagulation using aluminium electrodes”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering , vol. 543, 012098, Jun 2019.
26
X. Li, et al. “From marine to freshwater environment: a review of the ecotoxicological effects of microplastics Ecotoxicology ”, Journal of Environment and Safety , vol. 251, pp. 114564, Feb 2023.
27
M. Cole, P. Lindeque, E. Fileman, C. Halsband, and T. S. Galloway, “The impact of polystyrene microplastics on feeding, function and fecundity in the marine copepod Calanus helgolandicus”, Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 1130-1137, Jan 2015.
28
D. Neves, P. Sobral, J.L. Ferreira, T. Pereira, “Ingestion of microplastics by commercial fish off the Portuguese coast”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 119-126, Dec 2015.
29
F. Haque, and C. Fan, “ Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of their sources, formation, fate, and ecotoxicological impact ”, Chapters, in: Monique Mancuso & Teresa Bottari & Ahmed A. Abdelhafez & Mohamed Abbas (ed.), Marine Pollution - Recent Developments, IntechOpen. pp. 1-33, 2022.
30
J. Kang, L. Zhou, X. Duan, H. Sun, Z,Ao, S. Wang, “Degradation of cosmetic microplastics via functionalized carbon nanosprings”, Matter, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 745-758, Sep 2019.
31
C. B. Crawford, and B. Quinn, “ Microplastic collection techniques”, In: Crawford CB, Quinn B (eds) Microplastic pollutants. Elsevier, pp. 179-202, 2019.
32
V. Hidalgo-Ruz, L.G. Richard, C. Thompson, M. Thiel, “Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification”, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 46, pp. 3060-3075, Mar 2012.
33
T. Rocha-Santos, M.F. Costa, “Catherine Mouneyrac, Handbook of Microplastics in the Environment”, pp. 6-16, Springer Nature Switzerland AG , ISBN 978-3-030-39041-9 (eBook), 2022.
34
H. Effendi, M. Kawaroe, D.F. Lestari, “Ecological risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface sediment of Mahakam Delta East Kalimantan”, Procedia Environmental Science , vol. 33, pp. 574-582, 2016.
35
K. Rezaee Ebrahim Saraee, M. R. Abdi, K. Naghavi, E. Saion, M. A. Shafaei, and N. Soltani, “Distribution of heavy metals in surface sediments from the South China Sea Ecosystem, Malaysia”, Environmental Monitoring Assessment , vol. 183, no. 1-4, pp. 545-554, Dec 2011.
36
X. Li, et al. “From marine to freshwater environment: a review of the ecotoxicological effects of microplastics, Ecotoxicology Environmental Saf ety, vol. 251, 114564, Feb 2023.
37
Z. Pan, Q. Liu, R. Jiang, W. Li, X. Sun, and H. Lin, “Microplastic pollution and ecological risk assessment in an estuarine environment: the Dongshan Bay of China”, Chemosphere, vol. 262, pp. 127876, Jan 2021.
38
P. Xu, G. Peng, L. Su, Y. Gao, L. Gao, and D. Li, “Microplastic risk assessment in surface waters: a case study in the Changjiang Estuary, China”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 133, pp. 647-654, Aug 2018.
39
D.L. Tomlinson, J.G. Wilson, C.R. Harris, and D.W. Jeffrey, “Problems in the assessment of heavy-metal levels in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index”, Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen , vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 566-575, Mar 1980.
40
L. Hakanson, “An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control.a sedimentological approach”, Water Research, vol. 14, no.8, pp. 975-1001, 1980.
41
A. H. M. E. Kabir, M. Sekine, T. Imai, K. Yamamoto, A. Kanno, and T. Higuchi, “Assessing small-scale freshwater microplastics pollution, land-use, source-to-sink conduits, and pollution risks: perspectives from Japanese rivers polluted with microplastics”, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 768, pp. 144655, May 2021.
42
J. Mutuku, M. Yanotti, M. Tocock, and D. H. MacDonald, “The abundance of microplastics in the world’s oceans: a systematic review”, Oceans, vol. 5, pp. 398-428, Jun 2024.
43
M. T. A. Matiddi, C. Silvestri, A. M. Cicero, and E. Magaletti, “First evidence of microplastics in the ballast water of commercial ships”, Fate and Impact of Microplastics in Marine Ecosystems From the Coastline to the Open Sea, pp. 136-137, Jan 2017.
44
K. Kor, and A. Mehdinia, “Neustonic microplastic pollution in the Persian Gulf”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 150, pp. 110665, Jan 2020.
45
A. Manbohi, A. Mehdinia, R. Rahnama, and R. Dehbandi, “Microplastic pollution in inshore and offshore surface waters of the southern Caspian Sea”, Chemosphere, vol. 281, 130896, Oct 2021.
46
V.Z. Sönmez, C. Akarsu, and N. Sivri, “Impact of coastal wastewater treatment plants on microplastic pollution in surface seawater and ecological risk assessment”, Environmental Pollution, vol. 318, 120922, Feb 2023.
47
M. Cole, H. Webb, P. K. Lindeque, E. S. Fileman, C. Halsband, and T. S. Galloway, “Isolation of microplastics in biota-rich seawater samples and marine organisms”, Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 4528, pp. 1-8, Mar 2014.
48
L. G. A. Barboza, A. D. Vethaak, B. R. Lavorante, A. K. Lundebye, and L. Guilhermino, “Marine microplastic debris: an emerging issue for food security, food safety and human health”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 133, pp. 336-348, Aug 2018.
49
N. Von Moos, P. Burkhardt-Holm, A. Köhler, “Uptake and effects of microplastics on cells and tissue of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. after an experimental exposure”, Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 46, pp. 11327-11335, Oct 2012.
50
R. K. Naik, P. Chakraborty, P. M. D’Costa, N. Anilkumar, R. Mishra, and V. Fernandes, “A simple technique to mitigate microplastic pollution and its mobility (via ballast water) in the global ocean”, Environmental Pollution, vol. 283, pp. 117070, Aug 2021.
51
S. Dobaradaran, F. Soleimani, I. Nabipour, R. Saeedi, and M. J. Mohammadi, “Heavy metal levels of ballast waters in commercial ships entering Bushehr port along the Persian Gulf”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 126, pp. 74-76, Jan 2018.
52
A. Naji, M.A. Nuri, “Microplastics contamination in molluscs from the northern part of the Persian Gulf”, Environmental Pollution, vol. 235, pp. 113-120, Apr 2018.
53
X. Sun, J. Liang, M. Zhu, Y. Zhao, and B. Zhang, “Microplastics in seawater and zooplankton from the Yellow Sea”, Environmental Pollution, vol. 242, pp. 585-595, Nov 2018.
54
S. M. Park, H. Jin Kim, H. Rim Cho, K. Hwan Kong, D. Kyeom Park, and J. K.Paik, “Effect of pneumatic rubber fenders on the prevention of structural damage during collisions between a ship-shaped offshore installation and a shuttle tanker working side-by-side”, Ships and Offshore Structures , vol 18, no. 4, pp. 596-608, 2023.
55
S. A. Dar, and K. M. Gani, “Deciphering the source contribution of microplastics in the glaciers of the North-Western Himalayas”, Journal of Hazardous Materials , vol. 491, 137975, Jul 2025.
56
M. Ranjani, et al. “Assessment of potential ecological risk of microplastics in the coastal sediments of India: a meta-analysis”, Marine Pollution Bulletin , vol. 163, 111969, Feb 2021.
57
Z. Yin, “The pollution of microplastics in sediments: the ecological risk assessment and pollution source analysis”, Science of the Total Environment , vol. 859, 160323, Feb 2023.
58
H. Yang, F. Sun, H. Liao, Y. Guo, T. Pan, and F. Wu, “The pollution of microplastics in sediments of the Yangtze River Basin: occurrence, distribution characteristics, and basin-scale multilevel ecological risk assessment”, Water Research, vol. 243, 120322, Sep 2023.
59
K. K. Riya, et al. “Characteristics, contamination levels, and ecosystem risk assessment of microplastics in surface water of a highly urbanized river from a developing country”, ACS Omega , vol. 9, no. 52, pp. 50922-50932, Dec 2024.
60
S. Hajiouni, et al. “Occurrence of microplastics and phthalate esters in urban runoff: a focus on the Persian Gulf coastline”, Science of Total Environmental, vol. 806, no. 1, 150559, Feb 2022.
61
P. Prarat, and P. Hongsawat, “Microplastic pollution in surface seawater and beach sand from the shore of Rayong province, Thailand: distribution, characterization, and ecological risk assessment”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 174, 113200, Jan 2022.
62
D. Lithner, A. Larsson, and G. Dave, “Environmental and health hazard ranking and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical composition”, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 409, pp. 3309-3324, Aug 2011.
63
G. Liu, Z. Zhu, Y. Yang, Y. Sun, F. Yu, and J. Ma, “Sorption behavior and mechanism of hydrophilic organic chemicals to virgin and aged microplastics in freshwater and seawater”, Environmental Pollution, vol. 246, pp. 26-33, Mar 2019.
64
M. J. Stapleton, A. J. Ansari, and F. I. Hai, “Antibiotic sorption onto microplastics in water: a critical review of the factors, mechanisms and implications”, Water Research, vol. 15, no. 233, 119790, Apr 2023.